
The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
Exin Therapeutics, a San Francisco biotech startup, used an AI agent to autonomously select a gene therapy and guide a robotic injector into a live mouse's brain. The AI controlled treatment choice and injection parameters, with human supervision and safety measures in place. No harm was reported, but the procedure posed inherent risks.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The AI system was used to perform a brain injection on a live mouse, which is a direct physical intervention with potential for injury or harm to the animal. The AI controlled the robotic arm and injection needle, making decisions about treatment and injection parameters. This constitutes use of an AI system that directly led to a procedure with inherent risk of harm to a living being. Although no injury was reported, the event involves realized use of AI in a context where harm could occur, and the AI's role was central. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident due to the direct involvement of AI in a procedure with potential for injury or harm to a person or group (here, the animal).[AI generated]