Catalogue of Tools & Metrics for Trustworthy AI

These tools and metrics are designed to help AI actors develop and use trustworthy AI systems and applications that respect human rights and are fair, transparent, explainable, robust, secure and safe.

Recent research on the application of remote sensing and deep learning-based analysis in precision agriculture demonstrated a potential for improved crop management and reduced environmental impacts of agricultural production. Despite the promising results, the practical relevance of these technologies for field deployment requires novel algorithms that are customized for analysis of agricultural images and robust to implementation on natural field imagery. The paper presents an approach for analyzing aerial images of a potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) crop using deep neural networks. The main objective is to demonstrate automated spatial recognition of healthy vs. stressed crop at a plant level. Specifically, we examine premature plant senescence resulting in drought stress on Russet Burbank potato plants. We propose a novel deep learning (DL) model for detecting crop stress, named Retina-UNet-Ag. The proposed architecture is a variant of Retina-UNet and includes connections from low-level semantic representation maps to the feature pyramid network. The paper also introduces a dataset of aerial field images acquired with a Parrot Sequoia camera. The dataset includes manually annotated bounding boxes of healthy and stressed plant regions. Experimental validation demonstrated the ability for distinguishing healthy and stressed plants in field images, achieving an average dice score coefficient (DSC) of 0.74. A comparison to related state-of-the-art DL models for object detection revealed that the presented approach is effective for this task. The proposed method is conducive toward the assessment and recognition of potato crop stress in aerial field images collected under natural conditions.

About the metric use case




Modify this use case

catalogue Logos

Disclaimer: The tools and metrics featured herein are solely those of the originating authors and are not vetted or endorsed by the OECD or its member countries. The Organisation cannot be held responsible for possible issues resulting from the posting of links to third parties' tools and metrics on this catalogue. More on the methodology can be found at https://oecd.ai/catalogue/faq.