Catalogue of Tools & Metrics for Trustworthy AI

These tools and metrics are designed to help AI actors develop and use trustworthy AI systems and applications that respect human rights and are fair, transparent, explainable, robust, secure and safe.

BS PAS 1881:2022 - Assuring the operational safety of automated vehicles. Specification



What is PAS 1881:2022 about? 
PAS 1881:2022 is the first full revision of PAS 1881:2020 to reflect learning from recent automated vehicle trials and input from stakeholders. It deals with how to build operational safety cases for trialling and testing of AVs so that ultimately connected and automated vehicles can be deployed safely, and the public will be confident about their safety. This PAS expands the requirements of the UK Department for Transport (DfT’s) Code of practice and aligns with the requirements of other PAS Standards, including PAS 1882, PAS 1883, PAS 1884 and PAS 1885. 

Who is PAS 1881:2022 for? PAS 1881:2022 is intended for use by trialling organizations, including private developers and original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), developing safety cases for automated vehicle trials and testing. It might be of interest to organizations requiring assurance that a safety case has been developed in line with good practice. 
For example: 

  • Highway authorities 
  • Road operators 
  • Landowners 
  • Leaseholders 
  • Insurers 

It might also be of interest to organizations developing and implementing automation in off-highway environments. 

What does PAS 1881:2022 cover? 
PAS 1881:2022 specifies requirements for operational safety cases and the supporting safety management system for automated vehicle trials and testing in the UK to demonstrate that the operation of automated vehicles can be undertaken safely and securely within the defined operating environment. 
The standard includes: 

  • Safety case requirements and ownership 
  • Safety management system 
  • Contents of the safety case 
  • Safety assurance guidance 
  • Legislative and good practice framework underpinning the safety case 
  • Safety case development and case studies 
  • Operational guidance 

Why should you use PAS 1881:2022? 
PAS 1881:2022 creates a standardized and consistent approach to safety case development and encourages safety to be prioritized during technology development, trials and testing. It is applicable to all real-world testing environments, including testbeds, public domains and privately owned land and to all levels of driving automation systems. 
The standard will: 

  • Support the wider use of CAV technology and promote safety of advanced trials of CAV services 
  • Showcase the UK's leadership in this fast evolving, highly technical and challenging domain 
  • Provide the public with greater assurance of CAV and CAV trial safety 

Help increase the number of CAV trials conducted, thereby increasing opportunities for learning PAS 1881 forms part of a broader CAV programme of the standards led by BSI
PAS 1881:2022 contributes to UN Sustainable Development Goal 9 on building resilient infrastructure, promoting inclusive and sustainable industrialization and fostering innovation. © BSI 2022 All rights reserved

The information about this standard has been compiled by the AI Standards Hub, an initiative dedicated to knowledge sharing, capacity building, research, and international collaboration in the field of AI standards. You can find more information and interactive community features related to this standard by visiting the Hub’s AI standards database here. To access the standard directly, please visit the developing organisation’s website.

About the tool


Developing organisation(s):


Tool type(s):


Objective(s):


Target sector(s):


Type of approach:



Usage rights:


Tags:

  • Security and resilience
  • safety

Modify this tool

Use Cases

There is no use cases for this tool yet.

Would you like to submit a use case for this tool?

If you have used this tool, we would love to know more about your experience.

Add use case
catalogue Logos

Disclaimer: The tools and metrics featured herein are solely those of the originating authors and are not vetted or endorsed by the OECD or its member countries. The Organisation cannot be held responsible for possible issues resulting from the posting of links to third parties' tools and metrics on this catalogue. More on the methodology can be found at https://oecd.ai/catalogue/faq.