Catalogue of Tools & Metrics for Trustworthy AI

These tools and metrics are designed to help AI actors develop and use trustworthy AI systems and applications that respect human rights and are fair, transparent, explainable, robust, secure and safe.

ETSI GR ENI 009 V 1.1.1 - Experiential Networked Intelligence (ENI) - Definition of data processing mechanisms



The present document revises ETSI GR ENI 009. The realization of intelligent network depends on the big data, AI algorithms and computing resources. Therefore, effective data management and operation is extremely important. This work item is purposed to draft a GR of data operation requirements and mechanisms to better serve ENI system: 

  • (1) Data format among the Functional Block of ENI system and towards the external world (internal Functional Blocks, Knowledge Representation), 
  • (2) Data Conversion and possibility to translate AI data model to be adapted to / from external system (external trained model imported into ENI), 
  • (3) Consistency of data format and interface to accelerate the Autonomus Network (AN) evolution process and 
  • (4) Ensure that customer privacy is not disclosed in the entire lifecycle of data collection, processing, and utilization (Federated Learning). 

© Copyright 2024, ETSI

The information about this standard has been compiled by the AI Standards Hub, an initiative dedicated to knowledge sharing, capacity building, research, and international collaboration in the field of AI standards. You can find more information and interactive community features related to this standard by visiting the Hub’s AI standards database here. To access the standard directly, please visit the developing organisation’s website.

About the tool



Tool type(s):



Target sector(s):


Type of approach:



Usage rights:


Geographical scope:


Tags:

  • data quality
  • Data collection
  • Data processing
  • data sharing

Modify this tool

Use Cases

There is no use cases for this tool yet.

Would you like to submit a use case for this tool?

If you have used this tool, we would love to know more about your experience.

Add use case
catalogue Logos

Disclaimer: The tools and metrics featured herein are solely those of the originating authors and are not vetted or endorsed by the OECD or its member countries. The Organisation cannot be held responsible for possible issues resulting from the posting of links to third parties' tools and metrics on this catalogue. More on the methodology can be found at https://oecd.ai/catalogue/faq.