The OECD.AI Policy Navigator

Our policy navigator is a living repository from more than 80 jurisdictions and organisations. Use the filters to browse initiatives and find what you are looking for.

Integration of AI into the accreditation process


Added by:   OECD analyst
Added on:   06 Oct 2026
Updated by:   OECD analyst
Updated on:   06 Oct 2026

This initiative introduces AI support into LATAK’s accreditation work to help staff prepare documents, emails and meeting materials more efficiently. It benefits employees by reducing routine manual work and helps clients receive clearer and more timely services. The initiative was developed to address growing workload and complexity that made it difficult to maintain efficiency and quality using human resources alone.

Name in original language

MI integrācija akreditācijas procesā

Initiative overview

This initiative addresses the growing complexity and workload of accreditation activities carried out by the Latvian National Accreditation Bureau (LATAK). Accreditation requires the review and preparation of large volumes of documents while complying with national, European and international requirements. Over time, this has led to a heavy reliance on manual work by highly qualified staff, creating risks to efficiency, consistency and the ability to meet strategic objectives.

The initiative leverages artificial intelligence as an opportunity to support staff in routine and time-consuming tasks, allowing them to focus more on expert judgement, quality assurance and strategic work. The main objective of the initiative is to improve the efficiency, quality and sustainability of accreditation processes while maintaining full human oversight and accountability.

AI tools are used to support activities such as drafting and reviewing documents, preparing correspondence, summarising information and supporting meeting preparation. By reducing time spent on repetitive tasks, the initiative aims to improve turnaround times, enhance the clarity and consistency of outputs, and reduce the risk of delays or quality gaps. At the same time, it supports staff development by strengthening digital skills and fostering a more open and innovative organisational culture.

The initiative has been implemented gradually through controlled testing, pilot use cases and practical workshops. A key principle is the use of officially approved AI tools within a secure infrastructure, combined with clear rules on data protection and mandatory human review of all AI-supported outputs. Staff engagement and training are central elements, ensuring that AI is understood as a support tool rather than a replacement for professional expertise. This approach helps build trust, manage risks and embed AI use into everyday work responsibly.

Looking ahead, the initiative is expected to evolve from individual productivity support towards more integrated and institutionalised solutions. Planned next steps include exploring additional AI tools, developing low-code or no-code digital platforms to support assessment and decision-making, and strengthening risk-management and governance frameworks. The approach is designed to be scalable and transferable, allowing similar public institutions to adapt the model to their own processes while maintaining transparency, security and human-centred AI use.

 

Other relevant details

Results, outcomes and impacts: Sixteen staff members use AI to support approximately 380 accreditation procedures per year. In specific cases, document-drafting time has been reduced by up to 70%, form completion is up to eight times as fast, decreasing from eight hours to just over one hour, and meeting preparation is up to six times as fast, decreasing from two hours to 20 minutes. Results were measured through pilots, time comparisons and staff feedback. Future initiatives are expected to deliver up to a 90% reduction in document-reading time, processes that are 35% faster, and report preparation that is 50% faster, while maintaining full compliance and quality without additional staff. Challenges and lessons learned: The main challenges included initial staff scepticism, concerns about data security and confidentiality, and the risk of over-reliance on a single technology provider. These risks were addressed through strong leadership involvement, limiting AI use to officially approved tools within secure infrastructure, and requiring mandatory human review of all AI-supported outputs. Gradual implementation through pilots and practical workshops helped reduce resistance and build trust. Key lessons learned are that AI adoption is primarily a leadership and cultural challenge rather than a technical one, and that learning by doing is essential. Clear governance, risk management, continuous training and a human-centred approach are critical conditions for success, together with alignment with organisational strategy and openness to collaboration and shared learning.

About the policy initiative


Category:

  • AI policy initiatives, programmes and projects

Initiative type:

  • AI use cases/projects in the public sector

Status:

  • Active

Start Year:

  • 2024

Target Sectors:


OECD AI Principles:

—

Other relevant urls:

—