Russian State TV Threatens UK with AI-Enabled Poseidon Nuclear Drone

Thumbnail Image

The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.

Russian state TV, via anchor Dmitry Kiselyov, threatened the UK with the Poseidon autonomous underwater drone, capable of carrying nuclear warheads and creating a radioactive tsunami. The broadcasts highlighted the AI-driven weapon's destructive potential, raising concerns about the catastrophic risks posed by AI-enabled military systems, though no attack has occurred.[AI generated]

Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?

The Poseidon drone is an AI system as it is an autonomous underwater vehicle capable of high-speed navigation and delivery of a nuclear payload. The threat of its use implies a plausible risk of catastrophic harm to people, communities, and the environment (radioactive contamination and destruction). Since no actual harm has occurred yet and the article only reports on the threat, this is a potential harm scenario. Hence, it fits the definition of an AI Hazard, as the development and potential use of this AI-enabled weapon system could plausibly lead to an AI Incident involving mass destruction and radioactive harm.[AI generated]
AI principles
AccountabilitySafetyRespect of human rightsHuman wellbeingTransparency & explainabilityDemocracy & human autonomy

Industries
Government, security, and defence

Affected stakeholders
General publicGovernment

Harm types
PsychologicalPublic interest

Severity
AI hazard

AI system task:
Goal-driven organisationReasoning with knowledge structures/planning


Articles about this incident or hazard

Thumbnail Image

La nuova minaccia russa: "L'esplosione di un drone marino e il Regno Unito diventerebbe un deserto radioattivo"

2022-05-03
Video: ultime notizie - Corriere TV
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The Poseidon drone is an AI system as it is an autonomous underwater vehicle capable of high-speed navigation and delivery of a nuclear payload. The threat of its use implies a plausible risk of catastrophic harm to people, communities, and the environment (radioactive contamination and destruction). Since no actual harm has occurred yet and the article only reports on the threat, this is a potential harm scenario. Hence, it fits the definition of an AI Hazard, as the development and potential use of this AI-enabled weapon system could plausibly lead to an AI Incident involving mass destruction and radioactive harm.
Thumbnail Image

Poseidon, "attacco con drone sottomarino e tsunami atomico a Londra": la minaccia del portavoce di Putin

2022-05-02
Quotidiano Libero
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The Poseidon system is an autonomous underwater drone equipped with nuclear warheads, which qualifies as an AI system due to its autonomous navigation and targeting capabilities. The article focuses on the threat of its use, which could plausibly lead to massive harm including loss of life, environmental destruction, and disruption of critical infrastructure. Since no actual incident has occurred yet, but the threat is credible and involves an AI system with potential for catastrophic harm, this event is best classified as an AI Hazard.
Thumbnail Image

Il drone robot Poseidon, l'arma segreta con la quale la Russia minaccia uno tsunami radioattivo

2022-05-03
Rai news
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The Poseidon drone is described as a 'robot drone' underwater weapon, which reasonably implies AI system involvement for autonomous operation. The article focuses on the potential use of this AI-enabled weapon to cause catastrophic radioactive tsunami damage, which would cause harm to communities, environment, and property. Since the harm is potential and no incident has yet occurred, this fits the definition of an AI Hazard. The event is not a Complementary Information piece because it is not about responses or updates, nor is it unrelated since it involves an AI system with plausible future harm.
Thumbnail Image

Cosa sappiamo del drone sottomarino russo Poseidon, che trasporta armi nucleari

2022-05-03
Wired
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The Poseidon drone is an autonomous underwater weapon system, thus involving AI in its guidance and operation. The article focuses on its nuclear capability and the threat of use, implying a credible risk of catastrophic harm. Since no actual harm has occurred yet but the system's development and potential use could plausibly lead to an AI Incident involving massive injury and environmental harm, this event fits the definition of an AI Hazard. It is not an Incident because no harm has yet materialized, nor is it merely Complementary Information or Unrelated.
Thumbnail Image

Drone sottomarino Poseidon e missile Sarmat 2 contro la Gran Bretagna. La minaccia dello tsunami radioattivo

2022-05-03
IL TEMPO
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The Poseidon underwater drone is described as a robot capable of autonomous underwater operation, implying AI system involvement. The Sarmat 2 missile, while not explicitly described as AI-enabled, is a modern hypersonic missile likely to incorporate advanced AI or autonomous targeting systems. The article focuses on the threat of their use against the UK, which could cause massive harm including radioactive contamination and destruction of territory. Since no actual attack has occurred yet, but the threat and potential for catastrophic harm is credible and directly linked to AI-enabled weapon systems, this event qualifies as an AI Hazard under the framework.
Thumbnail Image

"Possiamo cancellare il Regno Unito con il missile Poseidon": delirio atomico sulla tv russa (video) - Secolo d'Italia

2022-05-03
Secolo d'Italia
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The Poseidon drone is an AI system due to its autonomous underwater navigation and targeting capabilities. The broadcast's depiction of its destructive power and the threat to the UK and Europe indicates a credible risk of future harm. No actual harm has occurred yet, so it is not an AI Incident. The event is not merely informational or unrelated, as it involves explicit threats involving AI-enabled weapons with potential for massive harm. Hence, it is best classified as an AI Hazard.
Thumbnail Image

Russian State TV Urge Putin To 'Wipe UK Off Map' With Underwater Nuke

2022-05-02
LADbible
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event explicitly mentions the Poseidon underwater robotic drone, which is an AI-enabled autonomous weapon system capable of causing massive destruction. While no actual harm has occurred yet, the threat and existence of such a system create a credible risk of catastrophic harm in the future. The hypersonic missile Sarmat is also a highly advanced weapon system, though less clearly AI-enabled. The autonomous underwater drone's capabilities strongly suggest AI system involvement. Since the event is about threats and potential use rather than an actual incident, it fits the definition of an AI Hazard rather than an AI Incident. The event is not merely general AI news or complementary information, as it focuses on the credible risk posed by AI-enabled autonomous weapons.
Thumbnail Image

UK Analyst Says Nuclear Tsunami Threat Could Be 'Propaganda Weapon'

2022-05-03
www.theepochtimes.com
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The Poseidon underwater drone is an AI-enabled system (robot/drone) with potential for causing massive harm (nuclear tsunami). The article highlights the possibility of future harm but no actual incident or harm has occurred. The analyst suggests it may be a propaganda weapon, indicating uncertainty about its operational status. This fits the definition of an AI Hazard, as the development and potential use of such a system could plausibly lead to an AI Incident involving harm to communities and property. There is no indication of realized harm or malfunction, so it is not an AI Incident. It is not merely complementary information because the main focus is on the potential threat, not on responses or updates to past incidents. It is not unrelated because the AI system presence is reasonably inferred and the potential harm is credible.