AI Deepfake of Ryan Reynolds Used in Fake Tesla Ad Sparks Outrage and Rights Concerns

Thumbnail Image

The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.

A financial influencer used AI deepfake technology to create a fake Tesla ad featuring Ryan Reynolds' likeness and voice without his consent. The unauthorized video, which falsely implied Reynolds endorsed Tesla, went viral, prompting public outrage and calls for legal action over rights violations and misuse of AI-generated content.[AI generated]

Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?

The event describes an AI-generated deepfake video that uses Ryan Reynolds' image and voice to promote Tesla without his consent, which constitutes a violation of rights (specifically, the right to control one's likeness and false endorsement). The AI system's use directly led to this harm. Although no legal action or formal complaint is reported yet, the misuse of AI to create misleading promotional content involving a real person is a clear AI Incident under the framework's definition of violations of human rights or breach of applicable law protecting fundamental rights. The event is not merely a potential hazard or complementary information, as the harm has already occurred through the unauthorized AI-generated content.[AI generated]
AI principles
Transparency & explainabilityPrivacy & data governanceRespect of human rightsAccountabilityRobustness & digital securitySafety

Industries
Media, social platforms, and marketingMobility and autonomous vehiclesDigital security

Affected stakeholders
OtherBusinessGeneral public

Harm types
ReputationalHuman or fundamental rightsPsychologicalEconomic/Property

Severity
AI incident

Business function:
Marketing and advertisement

AI system task:
Content generation


Articles about this incident or hazard

Thumbnail Image

Fans tell Ryan Reynolds to 'sue' after fake Tesla ad uses AI version of him

2023-05-19
The Independent
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event describes an AI-generated deepfake video that uses Ryan Reynolds' image and voice to promote Tesla without his consent, which constitutes a violation of rights (specifically, the right to control one's likeness and false endorsement). The AI system's use directly led to this harm. Although no legal action or formal complaint is reported yet, the misuse of AI to create misleading promotional content involving a real person is a clear AI Incident under the framework's definition of violations of human rights or breach of applicable law protecting fundamental rights. The event is not merely a potential hazard or complementary information, as the harm has already occurred through the unauthorized AI-generated content.
Thumbnail Image

AI Ryan Reynolds Used By Fan to Sell Teslas and Causes Outrage

2023-05-23
Movieweb
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The AI system was used to create a deepfake video that impersonated a real person (Ryan Reynolds) to promote a product (Tesla cars) without authorization, which constitutes a violation of rights and intellectual property. This misuse of AI has led to public outrage and legal concerns, fulfilling the criteria for an AI Incident under violations of human rights or breach of obligations protecting intellectual property rights. The article also discusses ongoing industry responses to AI use, but the primary event is the unauthorized AI-generated ad causing harm through rights violations.
Thumbnail Image

No, Ryan Reynolds did not endorse Tesla in a viral video

2023-05-19
WXIA-TV 11
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves an AI system (deepfake AI technology) used to create a fake video, which is a form of AI-generated content. However, the article clarifies that the endorsement is false and no actual harm has occurred. There is no evidence of injury, rights violations, or other harms resulting from the video. The event does not describe a realized AI Incident or a plausible AI Hazard since the harm is not materialized or credibly imminent in this context. Instead, it provides information about the misuse of AI-generated content and the social media reaction, which fits the definition of Complementary Information as it enhances understanding of AI's societal impact without reporting a new harm or credible future harm.
Thumbnail Image

Ryan Reynolds' Concise Reaction to Elon Musk Sharing His Tesla 'Ad'

2023-05-22
Crooked Llama News
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article discusses AI-generated deepfake videos, which are AI systems creating fabricated content. While deepfakes can pose risks, the described event involves playful exchanges without any reported harm or violation. There is no evidence of injury, rights violations, or other harms caused by these deepfakes. Therefore, this is not an AI Incident or AI Hazard. The article primarily provides contextual information about AI deepfake technology and social media reactions, fitting the definition of Complementary Information.