Botshit deepfake video of Hillary Clinton sparks AI misinformation concerns

Thumbnail Image

The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.

A generative AI deepfake showing Hillary Clinton endorsing Ron DeSantis highlights emerging “botshit”—fabricated political content designed to mislead voters. Experts warn unchecked AI-generated disinformation could reshape elections and undermine democracies, urging urgent measures to verify authenticity before such deepfakes distort political realities.[AI generated]

Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?

The article explicitly describes generative AI systems creating fabricated political content (e.g., a deepfake video of Hillary Clinton endorsing a political opponent) that misleads voters and distorts political realities. This misinformation can influence election outcomes and harm democratic processes, which constitutes harm to communities. The AI systems' outputs have already caused such harms, not just potential ones. Hence, this is an AI Incident due to realized harm from AI-generated misinformation affecting political discourse and voter decision-making.[AI generated]
AI principles
AccountabilityTransparency & explainabilityRobustness & digital securitySafetyDemocracy & human autonomyRespect of human rights

Industries
Media, social platforms, and marketingDigital securityGovernment, security, and defence

Affected stakeholders
General public

Harm types
Public interestReputational

Severity
AI incident

AI system task:
Content generation


Articles about this incident or hazard

Thumbnail Image

2778 tudós válasza: 5% esélye van annak, hogy a mesterséges intelligencia kiirtja az emberiséget

2024-01-09
hvg.hu
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article centers on expert opinions about the potential future risks of AI, including existential threats, misinformation, and other societal harms. However, it does not report any actual harm or incident caused by AI systems. The focus is on plausible future risks and the importance of research and governance to mitigate these risks. Therefore, it fits the definition of an AI Hazard, as it discusses credible potential harms that AI could plausibly cause in the future, but no current incident is described.
Thumbnail Image

Óvakodjunk a "botshit"-től - mesterséges veszélyben a politika - ITBUSINESS

2024-01-08
ITBUSINESS
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly describes generative AI systems creating fabricated political content (e.g., a deepfake video of Hillary Clinton endorsing a political opponent) that misleads voters and distorts political realities. This misinformation can influence election outcomes and harm democratic processes, which constitutes harm to communities. The AI systems' outputs have already caused such harms, not just potential ones. Hence, this is an AI Incident due to realized harm from AI-generated misinformation affecting political discourse and voter decision-making.
Thumbnail Image

Leépítés volt a Duolingonál, mert ezentúl inkább a mesterséges intelligenciára támaszkodna a cég

2024-01-10
telex
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article reports a corporate restructuring to increase AI usage, which is a general AI-related development. There is no mention of any injury, rights violation, disruption, or other harm caused by the AI system, nor any credible risk of such harm. The event is about AI adoption and workforce changes, which falls under general AI ecosystem updates rather than an incident or hazard. Therefore, it is classified as Complementary Information.