Foreign Deepfake Porn Videos Target Taiwanese Legislators in Election Interference

Thumbnail Image

The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.

In early 2024, deepfake porn videos falsely featuring DPP legislators Hung Shen-han and Lo Chih-cheng were anonymously uploaded to overseas adult sites and spread domestically, allegedly by Chinese-backed networks to sway Taiwan’s election. Both legislators reported the incident to police, prompting investigations into cross-border cybercrime and election meddling.[AI generated]

Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?

The event describes the creation and spread of a fake sexual video that was edited and disseminated online to harass and intimidate a political figure, which constitutes harm to the individual's rights and to the community by attempting to influence an election. The manipulation of video content and use of online platforms for spreading misinformation strongly implies the use of AI or AI-enabled tools (e.g., deepfake technology) for content generation and distribution. Since the harm is occurring (reputational damage, election interference), this qualifies as an AI Incident under the framework.[AI generated]
AI principles
AccountabilityPrivacy & data governanceRespect of human rightsRobustness & digital securitySafetyTransparency & explainabilityDemocracy & human autonomyHuman wellbeing

Industries
Media, social platforms, and marketingGovernment, security, and defenceDigital security

Affected stakeholders
GovernmentGeneral public

Harm types
ReputationalPsychologicalHuman or fundamental rightsPublic interest

Severity
AI incident

AI system task:
Content generation


Articles about this incident or hazard

Thumbnail Image

洪申翰遭爆性交易不雅片瘋傳 刑事局證實偵辦中

2024-01-09
Yahoo News (Taiwan)
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event describes the creation and spread of a fake sexual video that was edited and disseminated online to harass and intimidate a political figure, which constitutes harm to the individual's rights and to the community by attempting to influence an election. The manipulation of video content and use of online platforms for spreading misinformation strongly implies the use of AI or AI-enabled tools (e.g., deepfake technology) for content generation and distribution. Since the harm is occurring (reputational damage, election interference), this qualifies as an AI Incident under the framework.
Thumbnail Image

網路流傳"買春"片 洪申翰:沒鬍子.身材比我瘦太多

2024-01-09
Yahoo News (Taiwan)
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves AI systems plausibly used to generate or manipulate videos (deepfakes) that spread false information about political figures. This misinformation campaign constitutes harm to communities by undermining trust and interfering with democratic elections. Since the fabricated videos are actively circulating and causing reputational harm and political disruption, this qualifies as an AI Incident due to realized harm linked to AI-generated disinformation.
Thumbnail Image

又傳綠委私密影片 洪申翰稱:影中人身材比我瘦太多

2024-01-08
Yahoo News (Taiwan)
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article involves a fabricated video likely created or manipulated using digital or AI-based techniques (e.g., deepfake or video editing), which is being used maliciously to influence an election and harass a political figure. This constitutes a violation of rights and harm to communities through misinformation and election interference. Since the harm is occurring (the video is being spread and intended to influence the election), and the AI system's role in generating or manipulating the video is pivotal, this qualifies as an AI Incident. The event is not merely a potential hazard or complementary information, but an active incident of harm involving AI-generated or AI-manipulated content.
Thumbnail Image

「比我瘦太多!」 洪申翰遭爆性交易影片怒斥造假:明顯恐嚇企圖介選

2024-01-09
Yahoo News (Taiwan)
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves the malicious use of AI-generated deepfake technology to create and spread false and harmful content about a political figure, which is a direct violation of rights and an attempt to interfere with elections. The AI system's use in generating the fake video is central to the harm caused. The harm is realized as the video is being disseminated and intended to influence the election, meeting the criteria for an AI Incident. The investigation and law enforcement involvement do not negate the occurrence of harm but rather confirm it.
Thumbnail Image

被爆花錢買春! 綠委洪申翰:片裡男性沒鬍子也比我瘦太多

2024-01-08
Yahoo News (Taiwan)
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly mentions the video as a "deepfake" (deep synthetic media) which is an AI-generated manipulated video. The malicious use of this AI system to create false incriminating content has directly led to harm: defamation of the politician, extortion attempts, and potential election interference. This fits the definition of an AI Incident because the AI system's use has directly led to violations of rights and harm to communities. The ongoing police investigation and the described harm confirm this is not merely a potential hazard but an actual incident.
Thumbnail Image

立委洪申翰遭栽贓買春片外流 刑事局深夜證實偵辦中

2024-01-08
Yahoo News (Taiwan)
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event describes the creation and dissemination of a fabricated video that falsely implicates a legislator in illegal activity. The fabrication likely involves AI-based deepfake or video manipulation technology, which is an AI system. The harm is realized as reputational damage and extortion attempts, which fall under violations of rights and harm to communities. The criminal investigation confirms the seriousness of the incident. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident due to the direct harm caused by the AI system's misuse in fabricating and spreading false content.
Thumbnail Image

境外抹黃又一案! 洪申翰控遭散播不實性交易影片 - 政治 - 自由時報電子報

2024-01-08
Liberty Times Net
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article details a fabricated video falsely accusing a public figure, spread through online platforms using fake accounts. The video is described as edited and fake, implying the use of AI-based video manipulation techniques (deepfake or similar). The dissemination of such manipulated content causes harm by spreading misinformation, defaming the individual, and attempting to influence election outcomes, which is harm to communities and a violation of rights. The harm is occurring, not just potential, and the AI system's role in generating the fake video is pivotal. Hence, this qualifies as an AI Incident.
Thumbnail Image

洪申翰遭變造影片恐嚇 刑事局:去年底已受理報案偵辦中

2024-01-08
Liberty Times Net
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article describes a manipulated video falsely depicting a politician in a fabricated scenario, which is a typical use case of AI-generated deepfake technology. The video is being spread via online platforms, causing harm through intimidation and misinformation, which fits the definition of an AI Incident due to direct harm caused by the AI system's outputs. The involvement of AI in creating the fake video is reasonably inferred given the nature of the manipulation described. The harm is realized, not just potential, and the event is under investigation, confirming it as an AI Incident rather than a hazard or complementary information.
Thumbnail Image

人物/剩23萬存款被封最赤貧立委 洪申翰衰捲謎片風波籲警方嚴辦 | 政治快訊 | 要聞 | NOWnews今日新聞

2024-01-09
NOWnews 今日新聞
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves an AI system in the form of video editing technology (likely AI-based deepfake generation) used to create a fabricated video falsely depicting a public figure. The malicious use of this AI-generated content has led to harm by attempting to influence an election and potentially damaging the reputation of the individual, which constitutes harm to communities and a violation of rights. Since the harm is occurring through the spread of the fake video and the political interference, this qualifies as an AI Incident.
Thumbnail Image

洪申翰、羅致政遭傳「偽不雅片」國安人士:明顯為境外網軍操作介選 | 政治 | Newtalk新聞

2024-01-08
新頭殼 Newtalk
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly mentions the use of "deepfake" technology to create fake videos targeting politicians, which is an AI system application. The spread of these videos has already occurred, causing harm through misinformation and political manipulation, which affects communities and violates rights. The involvement of foreign actors using AI-generated content to interfere in elections is a direct cause of harm. Hence, this meets the criteria for an AI Incident rather than a hazard or complementary information.
Thumbnail Image

打假桃色性交易影片!洪申翰:幸好我不輕易減肥,不然跳黃河也洗不清 | 政治 | 三立新聞網 SETN.COM

2024-01-09
三立新聞
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly mentions a fabricated video falsely attributed to a politician, which is a typical use case of AI-generated deepfake technology. The harm caused includes violation of personal rights and harm to the political community by attempting to influence an election through misinformation. The AI system's use in generating and spreading the fake video directly leads to harm (defamation, election interference). Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident due to realized harm caused by AI-generated content used maliciously.