Mara Venier Victim of AI Deepfake Scam Promoting Financial Fraud

Thumbnail Image

The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.

Mara Venier, a well-known TV host, has been targeted by a deepfake scam using AI to create a false interview promoting fraudulent financial schemes. Her image was illicitly used to endorse Bitcoin investments. Venier has filed a legal complaint through her lawyer, Giorgio Assumma, to address this violation.[AI generated]

Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?

The article explicitly mentions the use of artificial intelligence to create a false interview, which is then used to promote illicit financial initiatives. This misuse of AI has directly caused harm by deceiving people and potentially causing financial loss. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident due to the realized harm stemming from the AI system's misuse.[AI generated]
AI principles
Privacy & data governanceRespect of human rightsTransparency & explainabilityAccountabilityRobustness & digital securitySafety
Industries
Media, social platforms, and marketingFinancial and insurance servicesDigital security
Affected stakeholders
Other
Harm types
ReputationalHuman or fundamental rightsEconomic/PropertyPsychological
Severity
AI incident
Business function:
Marketing and advertisement
AI system task:
Content generation

Articles about this incident or hazard

Thumbnail Image

Venier, diffusa falsa intervista a Sallusti, ricorso a Antitrust - Tv - Ansa.it

2024-05-16
ANSA.it
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly mentions the use of artificial intelligence to create a false interview, which is then used to promote illicit financial initiatives. This misuse of AI has directly caused harm by deceiving people and potentially causing financial loss. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident due to the realized harm stemming from the AI system's misuse.
Thumbnail Image

Mara Venier furiosa: "Sono disperata e preoccupata, la mia immagine è stata usata illecitamente per iniziative finanziarie" e scatta la denuncia - Il Fatto Quotidiano

2024-05-17
Il Fatto Quotidiano
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly states that AI was used to create a false interview with Mara Venier to promote illicit financial initiatives, which is a direct misuse of AI technology causing harm through deception and potential financial loss. The involvement of AI in generating false content that leads to harm fits the definition of an AI Incident, as it directly leads to harm to individuals (harm to communities and property through financial fraud) and violations of rights (use of image without consent).
Thumbnail Image

Mara Venier, diffusa falsa intervista a Sallusti. "Sono disperata, ho sporto denuncia"

2024-05-17
DiLei
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves the use of AI systems (deepfake technology) to create manipulated video content that falsely represents individuals endorsing financial scams. This misuse of AI has directly led to reputational harm and the risk of financial harm to the public, fitting the definition of an AI Incident due to realized harm caused by the AI system's use. The article details actual harm and legal responses, not just potential risks or general AI news.
Thumbnail Image

Mara Venier ancora vittima dell'intelligenza artificiale, la falsa intervista a Sallusti per vendere prodotti finanziari: "Sono disperata"

2024-05-16
Open
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly mentions the use of AI (deepfake technology) to create false interviews with public figures to promote fraudulent financial services, which is a direct cause of harm to people who may be scammed. This fits the definition of an AI Incident because the AI system's misuse has directly led to harm (financial fraud and deception). The involvement of AI in generating the deepfake videos is clear, and the harm is realized, not just potential. Therefore, this event is classified as an AI Incident.