
The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
Which? found Xiaomi Mi Smart and Aigostar air fryer apps request microphone access, personal details and link to Facebook, Pangle and Tencent trackers, raising privacy risks. While no harm has been reported, opaque data collection poses a credible privacy threat. The UK’s ICO will issue new guidance in spring 2025 to ensure transparency and protection for smart devices.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The apps connected to smart air fryers use AI-related technologies to collect and process user data, including sensitive information like audio and location. Although the article does not report a realized harm, the extensive and non-transparent data collection practices pose a credible risk of privacy violations and misuse of personal data, which are breaches of fundamental rights. The involvement of AI in data processing and the potential for harm justify classification as an AI Hazard rather than an Incident. The article also discusses regulatory responses, but the main focus is on the potential risk rather than a resolved issue, so it is not Complementary Information.[AI generated]