Morgan & Morgan Lawyers Sanctioned for AI-Generated Fake Case Citations

Thumbnail Image

The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.

In Wyoming, Judge Kelly H. Rankin sanctioned Morgan & Morgan lawyers for submitting AI-generated fake case citations in a lawsuit against Walmart. Rudwin Ayala lost his pro hac vice admission and was fined $3,000; two colleagues each paid $1,000.[AI generated]

Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?

The lawyers used an AI system to generate legal case citations that were fabricated ('hallucinated'), which were then submitted in official court documents. This misuse of AI directly led to legal sanctions and fines, demonstrating a clear harm caused by the AI system's outputs. The event involves the use and misuse of AI, resulting in a breach of legal and ethical standards, which fits the definition of an AI Incident due to violation of applicable law and harm to the legal process.[AI generated]
AI principles
AccountabilityRobustness & digital securitySafetyTransparency & explainabilityRespect of human rightsDemocracy & human autonomy

Industries
Government, security, and defenceBusiness processes and support services

Affected stakeholders
ConsumersWorkers

Harm types
ReputationalEconomic/PropertyPublic interest

Business function:
Compliance and justice

AI system task:
Content generation

In other databases

Articles about this incident or hazard