Delhi High Court Denies Early Hearing on Ban of DeepSeek AI Chatbot

Thumbnail Image

The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.

The Delhi High Court refused an expedited hearing on a petition seeking to block DeepSeek, a Chinese-developed AI chatbot accused of leaks of sensitive personal and government data. The bench ruled no urgency, advising users to avoid the platform until the regular hearing, scheduled for April.[AI generated]

Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?

The article involves an AI system (DeepSeek chatbot) and a legal plea concerning its access, but there is no indication that the AI system has caused any direct or indirect harm yet. The court's refusal for early hearing suggests no urgent harm or incident has materialized. Therefore, this is a potential future risk scenario related to the AI system, but no harm has occurred or is imminent as per the article. This fits the definition of an AI Hazard, as the development or use of the AI system could plausibly lead to harm, but no incident has occurred yet.[AI generated]
AI principles
Privacy & data governanceRobustness & digital securityRespect of human rightsAccountabilityTransparency & explainabilitySafety

Industries
Media, social platforms, and marketingGovernment, security, and defenceDigital security

Affected stakeholders
ConsumersGovernment

Harm types
Human or fundamental rightsReputationalPublic interest

Business function:
Citizen/customer service

AI system task:
Interaction support/chatbotsContent generation


Articles about this incident or hazard