Unauthorized AI Face-Swap Sparks Legal Fury in China

Thumbnail Image

The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.

Controversies have erupted over unauthorized AI face-swapping in China. One short drama replaced an actress’s face with celebrity Dilraba Dilmurat’s without consent, and a counterfeit version of the play '青蛇' used deepfake technology, leading fans and the National Theatre to demand legal action for copyright and image rights violations.[AI generated]

Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?

The article explicitly describes the use of AI face-swapping technology to alter video content, which is an AI system's use. The unauthorized manipulation of the actress's face to resemble Dilraba Dilmurat infringes on her portrait rights, a violation of intellectual property and personal rights under applicable law. This harm has already occurred, as evidenced by public outrage and legal discussions. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident due to the direct involvement of AI in causing a rights violation harm.[AI generated]
AI principles
Privacy & data governanceRespect of human rightsTransparency & explainabilityAccountabilitySafetyRobustness & digital security
Industries
Media, social platforms, and marketingArts, entertainment, and recreation
Affected stakeholders
WorkersBusiness
Harm types
ReputationalHuman or fundamental rightsEconomic/PropertyPsychological
Severity
AI incident
Business function:
Other
AI system task:
Content generationRecognition/object detection

Articles about this incident or hazard

Thumbnail Image

AI換臉偷用「迪麗熱巴五官」！短劇女演員變臉露餡　粉絲氣炸喊告 | ETtoday星光雲 | ETtoday新聞雲

2025-04-13
star.ettoday.net
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly describes the use of AI face-swapping technology to alter video content, which is an AI system's use. The unauthorized manipulation of the actress's face to resemble Dilraba Dilmurat infringes on her portrait rights, a violation of intellectual property and personal rights under applicable law. This harm has already occurred, as evidenced by public outrage and legal discussions. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident due to the direct involvement of AI in causing a rights violation harm.
Thumbnail Image

李碧華《青蛇》遭AI換臉 國家話劇院斥侵權

2025-04-11
std.stheadline.com
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly mentions the use of AI face-swapping technology to create unauthorized performances and promotional content, which infringes on the exclusive rights of the authorized theatre company and the original author. This misuse of AI has directly led to violations of intellectual property and personal rights, fulfilling the criteria for an AI Incident. The harm is realized, not just potential, as the unauthorized use and public ticket sales are ongoing. Hence, the event is classified as an AI Incident.
Thumbnail Image

「青蛇」遭AI換臉 高仿版在中各地巡演 陸國家話劇院出聲了 | 聯合新聞網

2025-04-11
聯合新聞網
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly mentions the use of AI face-swapping technology to create unauthorized and counterfeit theatrical performances and videos, which infringes on the intellectual property rights of the original rights holders. This misuse of AI technology has caused realized harm by misleading audiences and violating legal rights, fitting the definition of an AI Incident under violations of intellectual property rights and harm to communities. The involvement of AI in producing these counterfeit materials is clear and central to the harm described.
Thumbnail Image

迪麗熱巴疑被AI換臉 驚現網絡短劇

2025-04-12
Yahoo News
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event explicitly involves the use of AI technology (face-swapping) to manipulate video content, which is an AI system's use leading to harm. The harm includes violation of the celebrity's portrait rights (a form of intellectual property and personal rights violation) and reputational harm. The unauthorized use and distribution of such AI-manipulated content directly led to these harms. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident due to the realized violation of rights caused by the AI system's use.