AI-Generated Deepfake Used to Defraud by Cloning Spanish TV Presenter’s Identity

Thumbnail Image

The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.

Fraudsters used AI to clone the voices and images of Antena 3 presenter Manu Sánchez and nutritionist Sandra Moñino, creating a fake interview to promote a fraudulent weight-loss product. The deepfake video caused reputational harm and potential consumer deception, prompting public denunciation and calls for greater AI regulation.[AI generated]

Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?

The event involves the use of an AI system to clone human voices and images to produce a fake video used for fraudulent purposes, which constitutes a violation of rights and harm to communities through deception and misinformation. Since the AI-generated content directly led to a criminal scam and reputational harm, this qualifies as an AI Incident under the definitions provided. The journalist's response and call for regulation are complementary but do not change the primary classification.[AI generated]
AI principles
AccountabilityPrivacy & data governanceRespect of human rightsTransparency & explainabilityRobustness & digital securitySafety
Industries
Media, social platforms, and marketingConsumer productsHealthcare, drugs, and biotechnologyDigital security
Affected stakeholders
WorkersConsumers
Harm types
ReputationalEconomic/PropertyHuman or fundamental rightsPsychological
Severity
AI incident
Business function:
Marketing and advertisement
AI system task:
Content generation

Articles about this incident or hazard

Thumbnail Image

El presentador de informativos Manu Sánchez, tras el fraude con su voz e imagen: "Siento un profundo enfado"

2025-06-26
20 minutos
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves the use of an AI system to clone human voices and images to produce a fake video used for fraudulent purposes, which constitutes a violation of rights and harm to communities through deception and misinformation. Since the AI-generated content directly led to a criminal scam and reputational harm, this qualifies as an AI Incident under the definitions provided. The journalist's response and call for regulation are complementary but do not change the primary classification.
Thumbnail Image

Manu Sánchez denuncia en Antena 3 que han clonado su voz para promocionar un fraude

2025-06-27
eldiario.es
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The cloning of voices using AI constitutes the use of an AI system to commit fraud, which is a violation of rights and causes harm to individuals and communities. The event describes realized harm through fraudulent activities enabled by AI voice cloning, meeting the criteria for an AI Incident due to direct harm caused by the AI system's misuse.
Thumbnail Image

Manu Sánchez denuncia el uso fraudulento de su imagen con IA para una estafa: "Un profundo enfado"

2025-06-26
El Español
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves the use of AI to create a deepfake video, which is an AI system generating manipulated content. The harm is realized as the fraudulent video misleads the public and damages the reputations of the individuals involved, constituting a violation of rights and harm to communities through misinformation. The journalist's public denunciation and legal complaint confirm the harm has occurred. Therefore, this is an AI Incident due to the direct harm caused by the AI-generated deepfake.
Thumbnail Image

El periodista de Antena · Manu Sánchez, víctima de una suplantación de identidad: "Sentí asombro y ahora un profundo enfado"

2025-06-27
Hola.com
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly mentions the use of AI techniques (deepfake) to manipulate a real interview video, altering the journalist's voice and image to falsely promote a product. This manipulation led to a fraudulent campaign, which is a direct harm caused by the AI system's use. The harm includes identity theft, reputational damage, and potential consumer fraud. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident because the AI system's use directly led to realized harm.
Thumbnail Image

Manu Sánchez, víctima de una estafa tras suplantarle la identidad: "Siento un profundo enfado"

2025-06-26
La Razón
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves the use of AI to generate a fake video impersonating a public figure to commit fraud, which is a direct harm to the victim's rights and reputation and likely deceives consumers. The AI system's misuse has directly caused harm, fulfilling the criteria for an AI Incident under violations of rights and harm to individuals and communities.
Thumbnail Image

Manu Sánchez interrumpe Antena 3 para denunciar esta estafa: "Siento un profundo enfado"

2025-06-27
El Televisero
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly states that AI was used to clone voices to create fake interviews for fraudulent purposes, which directly caused harm through deception and identity theft. This misuse of AI technology led to reputational damage and potential financial harm to victims and consumers, fulfilling the criteria for an AI Incident. The harm is realized, not just potential, and the AI system's role is pivotal in enabling the fraud. Therefore, this event is classified as an AI Incident.
Thumbnail Image

Suplantan la identidad del presentador Manu Sánchez para estafar: "Siento un profundo enfado, por no decir otra cosa"

2025-06-26
Antena3
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves the use of AI systems to generate synthetic media (deepfake) impersonating real people without consent, leading to fraudulent activity and reputational harm. This fits the definition of an AI Incident because the AI system's use directly caused harm (fraud, identity theft, misinformation). The harm is realized, not just potential, and involves violations of rights and harm to communities. Therefore, it is classified as an AI Incident.