
The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
A Japanese consortium led by Fujitsu, with partners including NEC and academic institutions, is developing an AI-based fact-checking platform to counter online misinformation, especially during disasters and elections. The system, set for completion by fiscal 2025, aims to quickly analyze and verify the authenticity of internet content.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves the use of an AI system (a large language model-based fact-checking platform) designed to address misinformation, which is a recognized harm to communities. However, the system is currently under development and not yet deployed or causing harm. The article focuses on the potential of this AI system to prevent misinformation-related harm, which is a plausible future benefit rather than an incident of harm. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Hazard, as the AI system's use could plausibly lead to preventing or mitigating harm, but no actual harm or incident has occurred yet.[AI generated]