
The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
South Korea's Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport has selected consortia to develop AI-based drones for wildfire suppression and airport bird detection. The projects aim to enhance disaster response and aviation safety, but as the systems are still in development, no AI-related incidents or harm have occurred yet.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly mentions AI-based drones for bird detection and response, indicating the presence of AI systems. The event concerns the development and planned use of these AI systems, which could plausibly lead to harm prevention or, if malfunctioning, to harm (e.g., failure to detect birds or control drones properly). Since the drones are still under development and no actual harm or incident is reported, this is a potential risk scenario rather than a realized harm. Hence, it fits the definition of an AI Hazard.[AI generated]