Shanghai Court Rules User Liable for AI-Generated Copyright Infringement in 'Battle Through the Heavens' Case

The event explicitly involves AI systems (large AI models and LoRA models) used to generate images that infringe on copyrighted character images. The infringement of copyright constitutes a violation of intellectual property rights, which is a form of harm under the AI Incident category. The court ruling confirms that harm has occurred due to the AI system's use. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident because the AI system's use directly led to a breach of intellectual property rights.

The event explicitly involves an AI system (an AI image generation platform using large models and LoRA training) whose use directly led to copyright infringement harm. The unauthorized use of copyrighted images to train AI models and generate derivative content violates the copyright holder's rights, which is a breach of intellectual property rights under the framework. The court ruling confirms the harm has materialized and the AI system's role is pivotal in causing this harm. Hence, this is an AI Incident rather than a hazard or complementary information.

The event explicitly involves an AI system (a large generative model with fine-tuning capabilities) used by a user to reproduce copyrighted anime character images without authorization, constituting copyright infringement. The harm is realized as the court ordered the user to pay damages for violating copyright law, which is a breach of intellectual property rights. The AI platform's role was indirect and mitigated by its compliance with takedown and filtering obligations, so the primary harm stems from the user's AI misuse. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident due to direct involvement of AI in causing intellectual property rights violations.

The event involves an AI system (a large image generation model with fine-tuning capabilities) whose use by a user directly led to copyright infringement harm, specifically violation of intellectual property rights. The court ruling confirms the infringement and damages, constituting realized harm caused by the AI system's use. The AI platform's role and response are also detailed, but it was not held liable. This fits the definition of an AI Incident because the AI system's use directly led to a violation of intellectual property rights, a breach of applicable law protecting such rights. The article is not merely about AI policy or general AI developments, but about a concrete legal incident involving AI use and harm.

The event explicitly involves an AI system (a large generative AI model with fine-tuning capabilities) used by a user to generate images infringing on copyrighted anime characters. The court ruling confirms that the user's use of the AI system directly caused copyright infringement harm, satisfying the criteria for an AI Incident under violations of intellectual property rights. The AI platform's role was limited and it complied with legal obligations, so it is not liable, but the incident centers on the AI system's use causing harm. Hence, this is classified as an AI Incident.

The event involves the use of an AI system (large AI model and LoRA models) to generate images that infringe on copyrighted character images, leading to a legal ruling and compensation for copyright infringement. The AI system's use directly caused harm by violating intellectual property rights, fulfilling the criteria for an AI Incident. The platform's role as a service provider and its compliance with takedown and notification obligations do not negate the fact that the AI-generated content caused harm. Therefore, this is classified as an AI Incident due to realized harm involving copyright infringement through AI-generated content.