Polish Businessman Fights Meta Over AI-Generated Deepfake Ads

Thumbnail Image

The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.

Rafał Brzoska, CEO of InPost, is leading a legal battle against Meta over AI-generated deepfake ads using his and his wife's likenesses in Poland. Despite a court order for Meta to block such content, the deepfakes persist, causing reputational and financial harm and prompting calls for stricter platform accountability.[AI generated]

Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?

The article explicitly involves AI-generated deepfake advertisements that have been used to deceive and defraud people, causing real harm. The AI system (deepfake technology) is central to the incident. The harm includes financial loss to victims and violation of personal rights through unauthorized use of images. The ongoing legal proceedings and regulatory investigations further confirm the seriousness and reality of the harm. This fits the definition of an AI Incident as the AI system's use has directly led to harm to persons and communities, as well as violations of rights.[AI generated]
AI principles
AccountabilityPrivacy & data governanceRespect of human rightsTransparency & explainability

Industries
Media, social platforms, and marketing

Affected stakeholders
Business

Harm types
ReputationalEconomic/Property

Severity
AI incident

Business function:
Marketing and advertisement

AI system task:
Content generationOrganisation/recommenders


Articles about this incident or hazard

Thumbnail Image

Gigant bez kontroli, a kara tylko rośnie. "Na liczniku jest już prawie milion złotych"

2025-11-07
Interia.pl - Biznes
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly involves AI-generated deepfake advertisements that have been used to deceive and defraud people, causing real harm. The AI system (deepfake technology) is central to the incident. The harm includes financial loss to victims and violation of personal rights through unauthorized use of images. The ongoing legal proceedings and regulatory investigations further confirm the seriousness and reality of the harm. This fits the definition of an AI Incident as the AI system's use has directly led to harm to persons and communities, as well as violations of rights.
Thumbnail Image

Rafał Brzoska walczy z Metą. Jest sprawa sądowa. Może być precedens. "Ktoś musi wygrać"

2025-11-07
nextgazetapl
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event explicitly involves AI-generated deepfake videos, which are a product of AI systems. The misuse of these deepfakes has caused direct harm by enabling scams and unauthorized use of personal likeness, violating rights and potentially causing harm to individuals and communities. The legal action and court rulings confirm the harm has materialized and is ongoing. Hence, this is an AI Incident as per the definitions, since the AI system's use has directly led to harm and legal consequences.
Thumbnail Image

Brzoska: ktoś musi to wygrać i stworzyć precedens

2025-11-07
TVN24
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly mentions deepfake advertisements, which are AI-generated synthetic media, causing harm by misleading people and resulting in financial losses. The involvement of AI systems in creating these deepfakes is clear. The harm is realized, as evidenced by victims losing money and public figures seeking legal recourse. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident due to direct harm caused by AI-generated content and violations of rights through deceptive use of AI technology.
Thumbnail Image

Rafał Brzoska otwarcie o swoich planach. Chce wygrać przed sądem w precedensowej sprawie

2025-11-07
Business Insider
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves AI systems explicitly through the creation and dissemination of deepfake content, which is a form of AI-generated synthetic media. The harm is realized as reputational damage and misinformation affecting individuals, constituting harm to communities and violation of rights. The legal action and court orders to block such content indicate that the AI system's use has directly led to harm. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident because the AI-generated deepfakes have caused actual harm and the event centers on addressing this harm through legal means.
Thumbnail Image

Brzoska: Ktoś musi wygrać z koncernem Meta

2025-11-07
wpolityce.pl
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The presence of deepfake advertisements indicates the use of AI systems capable of generating realistic fake images or videos. The harm involves violations of rights and misleading false advertising, which fits the definition of harm to communities and violations of rights. Since the harm is ongoing and the AI system's use has directly led to this harm, this qualifies as an AI Incident. The article focuses on the harm caused by AI-generated deepfakes and the legal struggle to address it, not merely on potential future harm or complementary information.
Thumbnail Image

Brzoska mocno przeciwko deepfake. "Ktoś musi stworzyć precedens"

2025-11-07
superbiz.se.pl
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
Deepfakes are AI-generated manipulated videos created using artificial intelligence systems. The article explicitly states that these deepfakes use the images of Brzoska and his wife without consent, causing harm to their reputation and image. The harm is realized as the false materials continue to appear online despite legal actions. The involvement of AI in generating these deepfakes is clear, and the harm to personal rights and reputations is direct. Hence, this event meets the criteria for an AI Incident due to the direct harm caused by AI-generated content and the failure of platforms to prevent this harm.
Thumbnail Image

Brzoska dla "PB" o walce z deepfejkami: ktoś musi to wygrać i stworzyć precedens

2025-11-07
wnp.pl
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
Deepfake advertisements are generated using AI systems capable of creating realistic fake images or videos. The presence of such content despite court orders indicates a failure in the platform's management or enforcement mechanisms, leading to ongoing harm to individuals' rights and reputations. This fits the definition of an AI Incident because the AI system's use (deepfake generation) has directly led to violations of rights and harm to individuals and communities. The article focuses on the harm caused and the need for legal remedies, not just potential or future risks, so it is not merely a hazard or complementary information.
Thumbnail Image

Rafał Brzoska o swojej walce z deepfejkami. Ktoś musi to wygrać i stworzyć precedens

2025-11-06
pb.pl
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves AI systems explicitly through the use of deepfake technology to create fraudulent advertisements that misrepresent individuals and cause financial harm to people who trust these fake ads. The harm is realized and ongoing, with legal measures being taken to prevent further damage. The AI system's use in generating deceptive content directly leads to violations of rights and economic harm, fitting the definition of an AI Incident.