
The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
Deloitte's $1.6 million healthcare report for Newfoundland and Labrador contained fabricated or inaccurate citations attributed to AI assistance. The incident has led to public criticism, calls for stricter AI regulations, and concerns over misinformation in official government documents, highlighting risks of AI use in consulting and policy-making.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly mentions the use of generative AI (large language models) to produce false research citations in official reports, which were then used to support government strategies. This misuse of AI has directly caused harm by spreading misinformation and potentially influencing policy and investment decisions based on fabricated data. The harm includes violation of intellectual property rights (using false or fabricated citations) and harm to communities through misleading information affecting public health and education sectors. The AI system's role is pivotal as the hallucinated citations stem from the AI's outputs. Hence, this qualifies as an AI Incident rather than a hazard or complementary information.[AI generated]