AI-Generated Deepfake of Turkish President Used in Major Fraud Scheme

Thumbnail Image

The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.

In Sakarya, Turkey, scammers used an AI-generated deepfake video impersonating President Erdoğan to deceive İrfan Sezgin into a fraudulent investment scheme. Sezgin lost approximately 2.5 million lira, suffering severe financial, emotional, and social harm. The AI system's deepfake was central to enabling the scam.[AI generated]

Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?

The event involves an AI system explicitly used to generate a fake video impersonating a public figure, which directly led to financial harm to the victim. The use of AI-generated deepfake content to deceive and defraud constitutes an AI Incident under the framework, as it caused direct harm to a person through malicious use of AI technology.[AI generated]
AI principles
AccountabilitySafetyRobustness & digital securityTransparency & explainabilityRespect of human rightsDemocracy & human autonomyHuman wellbeing
Industries
Media, social platforms, and marketing
Affected stakeholders
Consumers
Harm types
Economic/PropertyPsychological
Severity
AI incident
AI system task:
Content generation

Articles about this incident or hazard

Thumbnail Image

Dolandırıcıların kullandığı yapay zeka videosuna kandı milyonlar kaptırdı

2025-12-25
En Son Haber
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves an AI system explicitly used to generate a fake video impersonating a public figure, which directly led to financial harm to the victim. The use of AI-generated deepfake content to deceive and defraud constitutes an AI Incident under the framework, as it caused direct harm to a person through malicious use of AI technology.
Thumbnail Image

İsrail terörüne sansür uygulayan sosyal medya şirketleri bunları engellemiyor! Sahte Erdoğan videosu ile can yakan dolandırıcılık

2025-12-25
Yeni Akit Gazetesi
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The use of a fake Erdoğan video implies the involvement of AI-generated deepfake technology, which is an AI system capable of creating realistic synthetic videos. The scam led to direct financial harm to the victim, which qualifies as harm to a person (a). Since the AI system's use (deepfake video) was instrumental in the fraudulent scheme causing realized harm, this event meets the criteria for an AI Incident.
Thumbnail Image

Erdoğan'ın yapay zeka ile üretilen görüntüsüne inandı, 2.5 milyon kaptırdı

2025-12-25
Memurlar.Net
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event explicitly mentions an AI-generated video impersonating a public figure used to scam a person out of a large sum of money. The AI system's role in creating the deceptive video is central to the harm caused, which includes financial loss, emotional and health impacts, and social harm. This fits the definition of an AI Incident as the AI system's use directly led to harm to a person (financial, emotional, and social).
Thumbnail Image

Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan'ın görselini gördü, yapay zeka tuzağına düştü: "Çocuklarım bana sırtını döndü"

2025-12-25
Mynet Haber
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves an AI system explicitly used to create a synthetic video of a public figure (President Erdoğan) to deceive and defraud a person. The AI-generated content was central to the scam, leading to financial loss, emotional distress, and social harm to the victim. This meets the criteria for an AI Incident because the AI system's use directly led to harm to a person (financial and emotional harm) and harm to the victim's community (family and social relationships).
Thumbnail Image

Yapay zeka tuzağı hayatını kararttı

2025-12-25
Haberler
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event explicitly mentions the use of AI to produce a fake video of a public figure, which was the initial cause of the victim's belief and subsequent financial loss. The AI system's output was central to the scam, leading to realized harm including financial damage, emotional distress, and social isolation. This fits the definition of an AI Incident as the AI system's use directly led to harm to a person (financial and emotional harm) and harm to the community (trust and social relations).
Thumbnail Image

Dolandırıcılar yapay zeka ile vatandaşı dolandırdı!

2025-12-25
Haber 7
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves an AI system explicitly mentioned as generating a fake video that was central to the fraud. The AI-generated content was used maliciously to deceive and cause financial and emotional harm to the victim. This fits the definition of an AI Incident because the AI system's use directly led to harm to a person (financial and emotional harm) and harm to the community (trust and social disruption).
Thumbnail Image

Yapay Zeka ile Hazırlanmış Cumhurbaşkanı Reklamlarıyla 2,5 Milyon Lira Dolandırılan Vatandaş

2025-12-25
Onedio
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article describes an AI system used to create fake videos and audio of the President, which were then used in fraudulent advertisements to deceive and defraud a citizen of 2.5 million lira. The AI system's use directly led to significant financial harm, which qualifies as harm to a person. Therefore, this is an AI Incident due to the realized harm caused by the malicious use of AI-generated content.
Thumbnail Image

Yapay zeka vurgunu: Erdoğan'ın sahte videosuna inanan vatandaş 2,5 milyonunu kaptırdı

2025-12-25
Haber7.com
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves an AI system explicitly used to generate a deepfake video of a public figure, which was instrumental in deceiving the victim and causing financial loss. The harm is realized and significant, involving loss of money and emotional distress. The AI system's role is pivotal in enabling the fraud. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident under the definition of harm to persons and communities caused directly by the use of an AI system.
Thumbnail Image

Erdoğan'ın yapay zekayla hazırlanmış videosuna inandı: 2,5 milyon lira borca soktular

2025-12-25
Cumhuriyet
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event explicitly mentions an AI-generated video that impersonates a public figure to perpetrate a fraud. The victim was misled by the AI-generated content, leading to direct financial harm and emotional injury. This fits the definition of an AI Incident because the AI system's use directly led to harm to a person (financial loss, emotional distress) and harm to the community (disruption of family and social relations).
Thumbnail Image

Yapay zeka ile üretilmiş sahte video tuzağı: Bir evimiz olsun dedik diyerek 2,5 Milyon TL kaybetti | Takvim TV

2025-12-25
takvim.com.tr
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event explicitly mentions an AI-generated fake video used to impersonate a public figure, which is a clear example of an AI system (deepfake technology) being used maliciously. The victim suffered direct financial harm (loss of 2.5 million TL) and emotional harm due to this deception. The AI system's role is pivotal in enabling the fraud, meeting the criteria for an AI Incident as it directly led to harm to a person and their community (emotional and financial harm).
Thumbnail Image

Yapay zeka ile Başkan Erdoğan'ın sesini kullanan dolandırıcılar bir vatandaşı 2,5 milyon lira dolandırdı

2025-12-25
takvim.com.tr
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly states that AI was used to create fake images and voice of President Erdoğan, which were used in a fraudulent investment scheme causing a victim to lose 2.5 million lira. This constitutes direct harm caused by the AI system's outputs (deepfake content) leading to financial harm and emotional distress. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident under the definition of harm to persons and communities caused by AI misuse.
Thumbnail Image

Yapay zeka videosuyla 2 buçuk milyon lira dolandırdılar: Cumhurbaşkanımın hastası olduğum için beni böyle kandırdılar | VİDEO İZLE

2025-12-25
Yeni Şafak
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves the use of an AI system to generate fake video and audio content impersonating a public figure, which directly caused financial harm to the victim through deception. This fits the definition of an AI Incident because the AI system's use directly led to harm (financial loss) to a person. The harm is realized, not just potential, and the AI system's role is central to the incident.
Thumbnail Image

Yapay zeka tuzağı hayatını kararttı: "Evim arabam olsun istemiştim"

2025-12-25
Özgür Kocaeli Gazetesi
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves an AI system explicitly through the use of AI-generated synthetic media (deepfake video) impersonating a public figure. The AI system's use directly led to financial harm (loss of approximately 2.5 million lira), emotional distress, and social harm to the victim. This fits the definition of an AI Incident because the AI system's use directly caused harm to a person and their community. The harm is realized, not just potential, and the AI system's role is pivotal in enabling the fraud.
Thumbnail Image

Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan'ın sahte videosuyla 2.5 milyon TL'lik vurgun - Dünya Gazetesi

2025-12-25
Dünya
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event explicitly mentions an AI-generated video that mimics the voice and image of a public figure to perpetrate fraud. The victim suffered financial harm (loss of approximately 2.5 million TL) and psychological harm (hospitalization, family distress). This fits the definition of an AI Incident because the AI system's use directly caused harm to a person and their community through deception and fraud.
Thumbnail Image

Yapay zeka tuzağına milyonlar kaptırdı! Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan'ın sahte görüntüsünü kullandılar

2025-12-25
Türkiye
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves an AI system explicitly used to generate a fake video of a public figure, which was then used to perpetrate a financial scam causing realized harm to the victim. The harm includes financial loss, emotional distress, and social harm, fitting the definition of an AI Incident. The AI system's role is pivotal as the deepfake video was the key tool enabling the fraud. Hence, this qualifies as an AI Incident rather than a hazard or complementary information.
Thumbnail Image

Erdoğan videosu hayatını kararttı! 'Çocuklarım dahil herkes...'

2025-12-25
Yeniçağ Gazetesi
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event explicitly mentions an AI system generating a fake video of a public figure, which was used to perpetrate a scam causing direct harm to a person. The harm includes financial loss, emotional distress, and social consequences, fitting the definition of an AI Incident as the AI system's use directly led to these harms.