
The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
Brian Cute, CEO of the Global Cyber Alliance, warned at the India AI Impact Summit that generative AI is enabling cybercriminals to conduct more effective and cheaper phishing, scams, and deepfake attacks. This AI-driven surge has led to increased harm to individuals and communities through more sophisticated cybercrime.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly describes how Generative AI is currently being used by malicious actors to increase the volume and effectiveness of cybercrime, including phishing and scams, which directly harms individuals and communities. This meets the definition of an AI Incident because the AI system's use has directly led to harm (a) injury or harm to people through scams and phishing, and (d) harm to communities through cybercrime. The mention of deepfake technology and agentic AI frameworks further supports the presence of AI systems causing harm. Although mitigation efforts are mentioned, the main focus is on the ongoing harms caused by AI-enabled cybercrime, not just potential future risks or complementary information. Therefore, the event is best classified as an AI Incident.[AI generated]