The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
Two university students have petitioned the Delhi High Court, challenging the constitutionality of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, which enables police to collect and store extensive biometric data using AI systems. The petition cites privacy violations and potential misuse, prompting the court to seek responses from authorities.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event describes a legal challenge to the biometric data collection system authorized by the Act, which involves AI systems for biometric identification and data analysis. The challenge is based on the potential for disproportionate and unconstitutional use of sensitive data, privacy violations, and lack of safeguards. Since no actual harm or incident has occurred yet, but there is a credible risk of harm due to the system's design and use, this qualifies as an AI Hazard. It is not an AI Incident because no realized harm has been reported. It is not Complementary Information because the main focus is the legal challenge to the system's constitutionality and potential harms, not an update or response to a prior incident. It is not Unrelated because the event clearly involves AI systems and their use in biometric data collection and storage with potential rights violations.[AI generated]
