The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
Multiple studies by GovAI and Brookings Institution highlight that in the US, 86% of workers in jobs most threatened by AI-driven automation are women. Professions such as translators and executive assistants, predominantly female, face particularly high risk, raising concerns about unequal societal impacts of AI adoption.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article involves AI systems in the context of automation and job displacement risk, which is a plausible future harm scenario. However, it does not describe any realized harm, incident, or malfunction caused by AI. It is a research-based assessment of potential AI impact on employment demographics, thus fitting the definition of an AI Hazard, as it plausibly leads to harm (job loss, economic impact) but no incident has yet occurred.[AI generated]