An AI company set out to fix news deserts. Instead, it copied local journalists' work
2026-04-03
Ben Werdmüller
The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
AI company Nota launched a network of local news sites using LLM-based content generation to serve news deserts in the U.S. The initiative was shut down after it was discovered that the AI system plagiarized local journalists' work and used photos without permission, violating intellectual property rights.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves the use of an AI system (LLM-based content generation) whose deployment directly led to harm in the form of plagiarism, which is a violation of intellectual property rights and journalistic ethics. This harm is realized and ongoing, as the AI-generated content copied existing journalists' work without attribution. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident under the framework, specifically under harm category (c) regarding violations of intellectual property rights.[AI generated]