
The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
Twenty-five French voice actors secured the removal of 47 AI-generated voice models from U.S. platforms Fish Audio and VoiceDub, which had cloned their voices without consent or payment. Legal action highlighted violations of intellectual property rights, though actors continue to seek damages and further legal protections.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves AI systems (generative voice cloning models) whose use directly led to violations of intellectual property rights by cloning actors' voices without consent or payment. This constitutes a breach of obligations under applicable law protecting intellectual property rights, fitting the definition of an AI Incident. The legal actions and platform removals are responses to this harm. Although the harm is non-physical, it is significant and clearly articulated. Therefore, this event qualifies as an AI Incident rather than a hazard or complementary information.[AI generated]