21独家｜对话张雪峰skills开发者：炼化、神话和法律边界
2026-04-13
21jingji.com
The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
Developers released an AI skill package mimicking deceased educator Zhang Xuefeng, trained on his copyrighted works and personal data without consent. This led to legal and ethical concerns over copyright and personality rights violations, with his company investigating the incident. The controversy highlights risks of AI-driven digital cloning and rights infringement.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The AI system is explicitly described as an AI skill package that generates outputs mimicking a specific individual's persona and consulting style, indicating clear AI system involvement. The use of the AI system without consent from the deceased or their legal representatives implicates violations of intellectual property and personality rights, which are legal rights protected under applicable law. This constitutes harm under category (c) "Violations of human rights or a breach of obligations under the applicable law intended to protect fundamental, labor, and intellectual property rights." Although the harm is non-physical, it is significant and clearly articulated. Hence, the event meets the criteria for an AI Incident rather than a hazard or complementary information.[AI generated]