
The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
Consumer associations in Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei tested 30 smart lock models and found that three facial recognition locks could be easily unlocked with photos, revealing serious AI anti-spoofing flaws. Additional risks include unencrypted data transmission and easily copied IC cards, posing threats to property and privacy.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves AI systems explicitly through the use of facial recognition technology in smart locks. The malfunction or inadequacy of the AI system's liveness detection and anti-spoofing features has directly led to security vulnerabilities that allow unauthorized access (harm to property and privacy). The article describes actual security incidents (successful unlocking with photos) and risks of data interception, constituting realized harms. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident due to the direct link between AI system malfunction and harm.[AI generated]