
The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
The U.S. government has mandated that all new vehicles sold from 2027 must include AI-based driver monitoring systems to detect impairment and potentially prevent driving. Critics warn of privacy risks, false positives, and loss of autonomy, while automakers and regulators acknowledge the technology's readiness and error concerns.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly mentions AI-related driver-monitoring systems intended to detect impaired driving, which involve AI system development and use. However, these systems are not yet deployed at scale, and no incidents of harm have been reported. The potential harms include privacy violations and false positives that could prevent sober drivers from driving, which are plausible future harms. Since the article focuses on the potential and challenges of these AI systems rather than actual harm, it fits the definition of an AI Hazard rather than an AI Incident or Complementary Information.[AI generated]