AI-Driven Scam Detection and Fraudulent Activity Prevention in Japan and the US

Thumbnail Image

The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.

Google introduced an AI-powered scam call detection feature for Android devices in Japan to combat deepfake voice fraud, warning users of suspicious calls. Simultaneously, AI is making fraud schemes, including cryptocurrency and romance scams, more sophisticated, leading to significant financial losses in the US and Japan.[AI generated]

Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?

The article explicitly states that AI's proliferation has made the fraudsters' methods more sophisticated, indicating AI systems are used in the commission of the frauds. The frauds have caused realized financial harm to victims, including in the US and Japan. Since the AI system's use is a contributing factor to the harm (making scams more effective), this qualifies as an AI Incident under the definition of harm to people (financial harm).[AI generated]
AI principles
AccountabilityTransparency & explainability
Industries
Digital securityFinancial and insurance services
Affected stakeholders
Consumers
Harm types
Economic/Property
Severity
AI incident
AI system task:
Content generation

Articles about this incident or hazard

Thumbnail Image

米国の仮想通貨詐欺、ロマンス型など被害1兆円超　日本でも200億円

2026-06-04
日本経済新聞
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly states that AI's proliferation has made the fraudsters' methods more sophisticated, indicating AI systems are used in the commission of the frauds. The frauds have caused realized financial harm to victims, including in the US and Japan. Since the AI system's use is a contributing factor to the harm (making scams more effective), this qualifies as an AI Incident under the definition of harm to people (financial harm).
Thumbnail Image

生成AIの「警察署長のAI子」が警鐘　若者に広がる特殊詐欺の被害：朝日新聞

2026-06-04
朝日新聞デジタル
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The AI system is explicitly mentioned as a generative AI used to create an educational video to warn about fraud. The AI's role is preventive and informative, with no harm or risk caused by its development, use, or malfunction. The article focuses on the deployment of AI for public awareness and crime prevention, which is a governance and societal response to fraud issues. Hence, it is Complementary Information rather than an Incident or Hazard.
Thumbnail Image

Androidの6月アプデがきた。詐欺電話を見破る新機能が使えます

2026-06-05
ライフハッカー［日本版］
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves the use of an AI system (the scam call detection feature using AI to identify deepfake voices) that directly prevents harm to individuals by warning them about fraudulent calls. Since the AI system's use is directly linked to preventing injury or harm to people (financial and emotional harm from scams), this qualifies as an AI Incident. The harm is ongoing and the AI system's role is pivotal in mitigating it.