
The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
Rapid expansion of AI-powered data centers in the US, especially in the PJM Interconnection region, is causing unprecedented electricity demand. During a severe heatwave, backup diesel generators are being used to prevent outages, raising concerns over air pollution and health risks among local residents.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article involves AI systems indirectly through the data centers that support AI technologies, which are causing increased electricity demand and leading to the use of polluting diesel generators. The harm (air pollution and health risks) is linked to the infrastructure supporting AI, not to AI system malfunction or misuse. The harm is potential and ongoing due to the operational practices and expansion of data centers, but no direct AI system failure or misuse causing harm is described. Thus, it fits the definition of an AI Hazard, where the use of AI-related infrastructure could plausibly lead to harm, rather than an AI Incident where harm is directly caused by AI system malfunction or misuse.[AI generated]