
The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
Over 100 authors have filed a $75 million lawsuit against Anthropic, alleging the company used pirated copyrighted books from shadow libraries to train its Claude AI system without permission or compensation. The case, filed in California, highlights ongoing legal challenges over AI training data sourcing.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly states that Anthropic allegedly used pirated copyrighted books to train its AI system Claude, which is an AI system by definition. The unauthorized use of copyrighted material for training constitutes a violation of intellectual property rights, which is a recognized harm under the AI Incident framework. Since the infringement has already occurred and the lawsuit is a direct consequence of this harm, this qualifies as an AI Incident rather than a hazard or complementary information. The event involves realized harm (copyright infringement) caused by the AI system's development and use, meeting the criteria for an AI Incident.[AI generated]