The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
The Delhi High Court granted interim relief to actor and politician Ravi Kishan, ordering the removal of unauthorized AI-generated, deepfake, and obscene content misusing his identity. The court restrained individuals and platforms from exploiting his name, image, and likeness, addressing harm caused by AI technologies. Major tech platforms were directed to comply.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event clearly involves AI-generated content that has been used without authorization to harm the actor's reputation and personality rights. The misuse of AI to create defamatory and pornographic content directly leads to harm to the individual's rights and reputation, fitting the definition of an AI Incident under violations of human rights or breach of obligations intended to protect fundamental rights. The court's intervention confirms the harm has materialized and is ongoing, not merely a potential risk. Therefore, this is classified as an AI Incident.[AI generated]