Catalogue of Tools & Metrics for Trustworthy AI

These tools and metrics are designed to help AI actors develop and use trustworthy AI systems and applications that respect human rights and are fair, transparent, explainable, robust, secure and safe.

Continuous Metalearning



Continuous Metalearning

Meta-learning is a promising strategy for learning to efficiently learn within new tasks, using data gathered from a distribution of tasks. However, the meta-learning literature thus far has focused on the task segmented setting, where at train-time, offline data is assumed to be split according to the underlying task, and at test-time, the algorithms are optimized to learn in a single task. In this work, the authors enable the application of generic meta-learning algorithms to settings where this task segmentation is unavailable, such as continual online learning with a time-varying task. They present meta-learning via online changepoint analysis (MOCA), an approach which augments a meta-learning algorithm with a differentiable Bayesian changepoint detection scheme. The framework allows both training and testing directly on time series data without segmenting it into discrete tasks. They also demonstrate the utility of this approach on a nonlinear meta-regression benchmark as well as two meta-image-classification benchmarks.

About the tool


Objective(s):


Target sector(s):


Lifecycle stage(s):


Type of approach:


Modify this tool

Use Cases

Mind Foundry: Using Continuous Metalearning to govern AI models used for fraud detection in insurance

Mind Foundry: Using Continuous Metalearning to govern AI models used for fraud detection in insurance

Continuous Metalearning is an AI governance capability, which has three core objectives:Manage model risks in production: with the ability to visualise, interrogate and intervene to ensure the continued safe use of AI;Maintain model capabilities post...
Sep 11, 2023

Would you like to submit a use case for this tool?

If you have used this tool, we would love to know more about your experience.

Add use case
catalogue Logos

Disclaimer: The tools and metrics featured herein are solely those of the originating authors and are not vetted or endorsed by the OECD or its member countries. The Organisation cannot be held responsible for possible issues resulting from the posting of links to third parties' tools and metrics on this catalogue. More on the methodology can be found at https://oecd.ai/catalogue/faq.