The OECD.AI Policy Navigator

Our policy navigator is a living repository from more than 80 jurisdictions and organisations. Use the filters to browse initiatives and find what you are looking for.

Responsible AI Policy


-
Added by:   OECD analyst
Added on:   08 Sep 2026
Updated by:   OECD analyst
Updated on:   08 Sep 2026

The Responsible AI Policy promotes the responsible development and use of AI aligned with ethical principles across the whole AI lifecycle. It shapes the direction for providing clear guidance to manage risks while enabling innovation. It promotes ethical and responsible use as well as mitigating harms such as bias, privacy violations, and misuse, while strengthening trust and accountability in AI systems.

Name in original language

سياسة الذكاء الاصطناعي المسؤول

Initiative overview

The Responsible AI Policy is developed to address the growing need for a comprehensive framework that enables the responsible adoption of AI while managing associated risks. As AI technologies continue to evolve and expand across sectors, they introduce significant opportunities for economic growth, innovation, and improved public services, alongside risks related to bias, privacy, safety, and misuse. The policy seeks to strike a balance between fostering innovation and ensuring that AI systems are developed and deployed in a safe, ethical, and trustworthy manner.

The primary objective of the policy is to establish clear governance principles and regulatory direction for AI across sectors. It provides guidance for government entities, private sector organisations, developers, and users to ensure alignment with national priorities and ethical standards. The policy promotes accountability, transparency, fairness, and human-centric AI, while supporting innovation through enabling mechanisms such as data access, infrastructure, and capacity building. It also aims to harmonise practices across entities and reduce fragmentation in AI adoption and oversight.

Looking ahead, the policy is expected to evolve into a more institutionalised and enforceable framework through the development of supporting regulations, standards, and compliance mechanisms. This includes integrating a risk framework, sector-specific guidelines, and monitoring and evaluation tools to track implementation and impact. The policy can scale through continuous updates, stakeholder engagement, and alignment with international best practices, ensuring it remains adaptive to technological advancements and emerging risks while strengthening national AI governance and resilience.

Results, outcomes and impacts
The initiative has established a baseline to enable proper AI maturity across entities, enabling improved visibility and benchmarking. Early outcomes include increased alignment on definitions, greater awareness of AI governance practices, and limiting potential risks associated with this technology.

Results are measured through surveys, maturity assessments, and periodic reporting across participating entities to  improve consistency in reporting and gradual adoption of the policy. 

In the future, the initiative is expected to drive higher AI adoption maturity, improved efficiency in government services, and stronger national benchmarking capabilities, with measurable improvements in data quality, compliance rates, and alignment.

Other relevant details

Challenges and lessons learned: Challenges include varying levels of AI maturity across entities, inconsistent definitions and methodologies, which could limit comparability and sustainability. Data availability, quality, and standardisation may also impact the accuracy of measurement and benchmarking. These challenges can be addressed through establishing unified definitions, standardised frameworks, and continuous capacity-building efforts, alongside strengthening local capabilities and data governance practices. Key lessons emphasise the importance of early alignment, clear guidance, and iterative engagement with stakeholders. Success will likely depend on strong governance, standardised safety metrics, and sustained cross-entity collaboration to ensure consistency, scalability, and long-term impact.

About the policy initiative


Category:

  • Regulations, guidelines and standards

Initiative type:

  • Regulation (by government authority)

Status:

  • Proposed or under development

Start Year:

  • 2026

Binding:

  • Binding

Target Sectors:


Other relevant urls: