Name in original language
Articulación de los instrumentos del planeamiento con el Plan Estratégico de Desarrollo Nacional, conforme a la cadena de resultados
Initiative overview
The initiative involves using artificial intelligence tools to analyse and align the Peruvian State's planning instruments within the SINAPLAN framework, in accordance with the results chain established in the Guide for Institutional Planning.
According to the regulatory framework, policies and plans must be vertically aligned to implement the national objectives of the National Strategic Development Plan (PEDN), which embodies the country's strategic development priorities and guides State action. However, in practice, this alignment is not always systematically verified or based on evidence.
To address this challenge, a methodology was developed that combines semantic embeddings, vector indexing (FAISS), re-ranking and structured validation using advanced language models (OpenAI API). This identifies levels of alignment between: Objectives and Strategic Actions of the PEDN (27 Strategic Objectives and 163 Strategic Actions); and Priority Objectives of the 43 National Policies approved as of 2025 (209 Priority Objectives).
The tool enables the detection of clusters, gaps and potential misalignments between strategic instruments, ensuring that National Policies—and progressively, other planning instruments—effectively respond to the priorities defined in the PEDN. This strengthens the coherence and effectiveness of national planning, directly impacting the quality of public policy monitoring and evaluation, evidence-based decision-making and the State's capacity to direct its interventions towards the effective achievement of national priorities and the generation of public value.
Results, outcomes and impacts
The benefits of the AI initiative are:
a. Systematic and Visual Identification of the level of alignment between the PEDN (Strategic National Development Plan) and National Policies.
b. Detection of Strategic Actions with low levels of implementation within National Policies (indicating potential implementation gaps, insufficient programmatic alignment or the need to strengthen interventions to ensure consistency with national priorities).
c. Identification of Priority Objectives with high thematic concentration.
d. Significant Reduction in Time required for manual comparative analysis, transforming a process that previously took approximately three months into one that can be completed in about three weeks.
