The OECD.AI Policy Navigator

Our policy navigator is a living repository from more than 80 jurisdictions and organisations. Use the filters to browse initiatives and find what you are looking for.

JULIO (AI PLATFORM)


Added by:   OECD analyst
Added on:   28 Oct 2026
Updated by:   OECD analyst
Updated on:   28 Oct 2026

The JULIO AI Platform is Peru's leading public sector digital transformation project. It uses AI to optimise registry services across three pillars: Specialised Consultation (natural language processing and large language models for legal precedents), a Learning Centre (manuals, prompt libraries, and automated "esquela" generators), and Integrated AI Access (specialised tools for registry contexts). Rather than replacing human judgment, it empowers staff to improve legal precision and efficiency

Initiative overview

The JULIO AI Platform is Peru's most ambitious digital transformation project in the public sector, designed to enhance registry services using artificial intelligence. Rather than replacing human judgment, it serves as a tool to optimise legal processes through three main pillars:

  • Pillar 1: Specialised Consultation Modules: Use natural language processing (NLP) and large language models (LLMs) to provide structured access to decades of legal precedents, technical resolutions, and plenary agreements.
  • Pillar 2: Learning and Study Centre: Provides practical resources for staff, including AI manuals, optimised prompt libraries, and adaptive templates. It features an automated generator for official observation and rejection notices (esquelas) to ensure compliance with standards.
  • Pillar 3: Integrated AI Access: Offers direct access to major AI applications with specialised guides tailored to specific registry contexts.

Results, outcomes and impacts

The main outcomes of the JULIO AI Platform are: a. Drastic time reduction: Decreasing the drafting time of registry entries from approximately 5 minutes to less than 45 seconds. b. Process standardisation: Ensuring that all registrars apply uniform criteria, regardless of their registry zone or level of experience. c. Error minimisation: Reducing errors of omission through tools that identify relevant data that might be overlooked during manual reviews. d. Capacity-building: Training registry staff in advanced digital competencies through the Learning and Study Centre. e. Citizen service improvement: Faster registrations without compromising technical quality, clearer and more complete observation notices (esquelas), and more complete responses.

Challenges and lessons learned

Implementation challenges: a. Resistance to change: Overcoming initial distrust of disruptive technologies through voluntary and collaborative adoption strategies. b. Training over 1,000 public servants across 14 registry zones with varying levels of technological familiarity. c. Effective prompt design: Developing methodologies so staff learn how to "converse" with the AI to obtain technically accurate responses. d. Template validation: Ensuring that entry (asiento) and observation (esquela) templates maintain the required legal precision. e. Technological integration: Co-ordinating the development and implementation of APIs and systems with the Information Technology Office. Lessons learned: a. Voluntary adoption works better than top-down imposition: Early adopters were enthusiastic volunteers who later became informal trainers for their colleagues.

About the policy initiative


Category:

  • AI policy initiatives, programmes and projects

Initiative type:

  • AI use cases/projects in the public sector

Status:

  • Active

Start Year:

  • 2025

Target Sectors:


OECD AI Principles:

—

Other relevant urls:

—