Section 1 - Risk identification and evaluation
KDDI has published the "AI R&D and Utilization Principles for KDDI Group" [1]. Based on the values outlined in these principles, KDDI categorizes risks on a use-case basis, while considering both domestic and international guidelines and regulations, including:
* AI Guidelines for Business (MIC and MEXT, Japan)[2]
* AI Act (EU)[3]
* AI Risk Management Framework (NIST)[4]
[1] AI R&D and Utilization Principles for KDDI Group
https://www.kddi.com/english/corporate/kddi/public/ai_principles/
[2] AI Guidelines for Business
https://www.soumu.go.jp/main_sosiki/kenkyu/ai_network/02ryutsu20_04000019.html
[3] EU AI Act
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32024R1689
[4] NIST AI Risk Management Framework
https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework
KDDI has developed a checklist regarding the risks mentioned in the response to section 1.a. Specifically, this checklist addresses concrete examples of AI-related risks and assesses whether those risks exist. In this context, we consciously adopt a "by design" approach to utilize this checklist during the planning phase of AI systems and to conduct evaluations.
At KDDI, internal auditors conduct interviews to assess the appropriateness of AI systems by utilizing the responses from the checklist referenced in section 1.b during the planning phase. Additionally, KDDI convenes an Advisory Board meeting [1] as needed to solicit insights on appropriate data utilization, including AI, by inviting external experts.
[1] KDDI Advisory Board on Appropriate Data Utilization for the Realization of Society 5.0 (Japanese only)
https://www.kddi.com/corporate/kddi/public/privacy-portal/advisory-board/
* KDDI utilizes both quantitative and qualitative risk assessment indicators, considering risk impacts and other relevant factors. Its internal regulations establish quantitative and qualitative criteria, and risk assessments are conducted based on the significance of the systems [1].
* All stakeholders can report vulnerabilities or incidents through KDDI’s inquiry contact form [2].
* Currently, there is no incentive program for the responsible disclosure of risks, incidents, or vulnerabilities.
[1] Risk Management and Internal Controls
https://www.kddi.com/english/corporate/sustainability/risk-management/
[2] Contact
https://www.kddi.com/english/contact/
In evaluating risks, KDDI utilizes Advisory Board meetings with external experts, as mentioned in the response to section 1.c, to gather feedback. Additionally, as indicated in the response to section 1.e, KDDI has established an inquiry contact form for third-party inquiries, including reports.
KDDI adheres guidelines and best practices in accordance with the response to section 1. a.
KDDI engages in discussions regarding risk mitigation measures through various channels, including:
* Advisory Board meetings with external experts, as mentioned in the response to section 1.c.
* Participation in the AI Governance Association [1].
[1] AI Governance Association (Japanese only).
No answer provided


























