The OECD.AI Policy Navigator

Our policy navigator is a living repository from more than 80 jurisdictions and organisations. Use the filters to browse initiatives and find what you are looking for.

Government AI Offices


Added by:   OECD analyst
Added on:   28 Aug 2026
Updated by:   OECD analyst
Updated on:   28 Aug 2026

AI has witnessed a rapid development in the past two years. Establishing AI offices in government helps coordinate the adoption of Artificial Intelligence in a structured, safe and strategic way. They create opportunities for innovation, stronger governance, and improved trust in AI-powered government services.

Name in original language

مكاتب الذكاء الاصطناعي في الجهات الحكومية

Initiative overview

As AI reshapes operations and service delivery, fragmented adoption limits value and increases risk. A dedicated AI Office enables safe, scalable and coordinated adoption by treating AI as a core organisational capability rather than isolated initiatives. It centralises oversight, standardises governance and ensures AI risks are systematically identified, assessed and mitigated, enabling consistent decision-making, clear accountability and traceability between strategy, use cases and outcomes, without owning technical development.

The AI Office serves as the single coordination point for AI activity across four domains. In strategy, it defines vision, objectives, roadmap and KPIs aligned with organisational priorities and the national AI agenda, balancing feasibility and risk. In governance, it ensures compliance with SDAIA policies, frameworks and standards while embedding risk controls and structured decision-making. In enablement, it ensures data, infrastructure, talent and processes are in place to support scalable adoption. In outcomes, it drives implementation, monitors performance and risk, and ensures delivery of measurable, sustainable impact.

The AI Office also acts as the primary interface with SDAIA, ensuring alignment with national policies and guidance. Its engagement focuses on alignment with national direction, participation in maturity and readiness assessments, coordination of adoption initiatives and structured reporting. This model strengthens oversight, accelerates adoption and embeds responsible AI practices across the entity.

Results, outcomes and impacts:
An AI Office is the entity’s central owner of AI, responsible for maturity assessments, strategic direction, coordination, governance oversight and capability enablement across the AI lifecycle, with risk assessment and mitigation embedded in decision-making and execution. It ensures AI initiatives align with entity objectives, follow structured processes, and deliver measurable impact with clear accountability, while serving as the single coordination point for all AI activity. Establishing AI Offices across government expands institutional capability, builds specialised teams, strengthens employee expertise and technical skills, and enables more effective development and deployment of AI solutions across the public sector.

Other relevant details

Challenges and lessons learned: AI is now a core lever for operations, decision-making, risk management and service delivery, yet many entities adopt it through fragmented initiatives, leading to limited impact, higher costs and avoidable risks. Without an AI Office, four key challenges emerge: fragmented efforts across departments with inconsistent standards, duplicated investments and low reuse of data and models, unmanaged risks such as bias and security vulnerabilities, and difficulty demonstrating measurable outcomes. Establishing an AI Office addresses these by centralising ownership, promoting reuse, standardising delivery and embedding governance. This improves efficiency by reducing duplication and accelerating time to value, enhances service quality through consistent standards and monitoring, and strengthens AI maturity via accountability and evidence-based reporting. It enables scalable, controlled and measurable AI adoption.

About the policy initiative


Category:

  • National – AI governance bodies or mechanisms

Initiative type:

  • Coordination bodies, offices or processes

Status:

  • Active

Start Year:

  • 2024

Target Sectors:


Other relevant urls: