The OECD.AI Policy Navigator

Our policy navigator is a living repository from more than 80 jurisdictions and organisations. Use the filters to browse initiatives and find what you are looking for.

BolognAI - Urban Intelligence (Subnational: Bologna)


-
Added by:   OECD analyst
Added on:   28 Oct 2026
Updated by:   OECD analyst
Updated on:   28 Oct 2026

A pathway developed by the Municipality of Bologna to govern the use of AI responsibly by combining strategic intent with operational delivery. It adopts a hybrid model in which critical decisions remain centralised, while certain capabilities may also be activated externally, with the aim of progressively strengthening key internal competences over time (e.g., risk management). All of this follows a single process, from ideation through to monitoring.

Name in original language

BolognAI - Intelligenza Urbana

Initiative overview

The Municipality of Bologna has framed responsible AI governance as a system of operational safeguards, rather than as a stand-alone pilot project. The objective is to balance speed of experimentation with robust control: before implementation, every AI initiative must be underpinned by adequate data, explicit accountability, the appropriate level of involvement, a risk assessment, and safeguards for citizens and employees.

To avoid an approach that is either too slow (top-down) or too uneven (bottom-up), a hybrid model has been adopted (centralised and Hub & Spoke). A central co-ordination function defines shared standards and common approval gates (prioritisation criteria, risk levels, minimum requirements for data/security/transparency), while the identification and structured analysis of needs remain the responsibility of operational units to ensure alignment with day-to-day processes. Strategic oversight and final decision-making are ensured by the Integrated Directorate, which safeguards overall coherence.

Key roles and functions are defined in the PDF file “organisational model roles and responsibilities ENG”: AI Ambassadors; Transformation Demand; AI Transformation Room; and BIS (Bologna Innovation Square).

In addition, assets such as the Civic Digital Twin strengthen synergies for AI use in areas such as simulation and decision support, providing infrastructure and methodologies for data governance and for addressing ethical and regulatory challenges (e.g., a technical–regulatory sandbox).

The model is designed to mature over time. Following an initial survey of around 4,000 people to map AI knowledge and perceptions, core governance capabilities (risk and impact assessment, use-case portfolio management) are expected to be progressively internalised. At the outset, these capabilities can be activated externally (via the AI Transformation Room) to accelerate delivery. As organisational maturity advances, a gradual decentralisation of responsibilities is envisaged.

The operational core is an end-to-end process covering the lifecycle of AI initiatives (with a RACI and standardised deliverables): Intake and validation: request form, expected KPIs, data mapping, initial risk classification and assessment of alternatives (reuse, build/buy); Controlled experimentation: PoC with acceptance criteria, quality/robustness testing, checks on security/privacy/bias, and definition of human oversight; Go-live and scaling: go-live checklist, model/supplier register, continuous monitoring of performance and drift, incident logging, and periodic reviews.

The demand phase is complemented by engagement actions (targeted training, guidelines, AI Ambassador communities) to embed compliance and responsibility directly into behaviours, making risk and data-assessment safeguards stable requirements integrated into the organisation’s ordinary pathways.

Other relevant details

Results, outcomes and impacts: The governance model mitigated the risk of fragmented AI demand, enabling adoption that is both standardised and participatory (bottom-up), through the following levers: guidelines to prevent ad hoc approaches; an end-to-end process that streamlines delivery; clear roles and responsibilities to ensure accountability; an inventory of AI systems to reduce duplication; an AI use-case risk model aligned with the AI Act; active engagement of AI Ambassadors in promoting the model; and upskilling for approximately 4,000 people, supported by periodic surveys to measure training effectiveness. Medium-term impacts are expected to include increased public value, as well as reusability and transferability to other public bodies. Challenges and lessons learned: The main challenges were technological as well as organisational: managing a rapidly growing demand for AI, establishing shared rules across organisational units, and updating skills and responsibilities in an evolving regulatory context. It is crucial to prevent ‘spontaneous’ use of AI and to foster strong connections with the external ecosystem. The most common and recurring risks concerned data quality and availability; the protection of rights and privacy; potential errors in generated content; bias and cybersecurity issues; as well as fragmentation across units and a lack of widespread capabilities. The key lesson is that ‘fast’ innovation works only if it is guided by clear, shared rules, and if people are enabled to use it with awareness and accountability. This requires a political–administrative mandate, multidisciplinary central co-ordination, internal communication to engage people, robust data governance, transparency, and impact monitoring.

About the policy initiative